Skating party in Lödöse

The Lödöse Museum in Sweden hosts an annual skating event—on bone skates! This year, the skating is scheduled for February 11 from 1 to 3 PM; the details are here (in Swedish).

Skating on bones in Lödöse, Sweden. Photograph courtesy of Marie Schmidt, Lödöse Museum.

There are videos of previous years’ skating events on the museum’s Facebook page. They are quite interesting to watch. The skating is done on synthetic ice (unless the weather is cold enough for natural ice to form), and the children don’t get to use metal-tipped poles for safety reasons. Out of necessity, they’ve figured out how to push with their feet on bone skates, and some even learned to spin on them.

Spinning on bone skates is easy on smooth ice in an indoor ice rink, with a pole. All you have to do is give a good hard push around and stand up straight. The skates have very little friction and spin quite easily once they get going. In fact, Formenti and Minetti showed that bone skates had less friction than metal-bladed skates for about five hundred years after metal-bladed skates were invented (1826).

The written descriptions of bone skates don’t mention tricks like this. Skaters seem to have focused on speed over style, but surely some enthusiastic medieval or early modern skaters figured out how to spin on bones. Edberg and Karlsson found that longer skates were more likely to have holes for attaching them to the skaters’ feet at two sites in medieval Sweden. They think this means older, more experienced skaters “may have had more challenging excursions in mind” (50). Could they have needed the extra control provided by bindings for spinning or doing other tricks? What other tricks might they have been doing?

References

Rune Edberg and Johnny Karlsson. 2015. Isläggar från Birka och Sigtuna. En undersökning av ett vikingatida och medeltida fyndmaterial. Stockholm Archaeological Reports 43. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.

Federico Formenti and Alberto E. Minetti. 2007. “Human locomotion on ice: the evolution of ice-skating energetics through history.” The Journal of Experimental Biology 210:1825-1833.

Writing projects

The final manuscript atop the archive notes and drafts.

The final manuscript of my book on bone skates is now on its way to McFarland, who will publish it. Watch for it in bookstores later this year.

Now I’m ready to get going on my next big writing project, a history of figures. As part of it, I’ve started a page of resources for people interested in skating them now. Along the way, I plan to produce a few more Skating History Press editions. Next in line is Lowther’s set of three little books: Edges & Striking, Principle of Skating Turns, and Combined Figure-Skating. Only an handful of copies survive in libraries around the world.

You’ll probably see more about figures than bone skates in future blog posts. But I’m sure I’ll find more to say about bone skates—they’ve been on my mind for nearly 20 years.

Bone skates and boats

I just ran across an interesting bone skate in the Swedish History Museum’s catalog. It’s listed as having possible boat-like carvings. You can see them if you look carefully at the picture: right about the middle of the bone, just above the number written on it, there are some curved scratches.

Photograph by Ola Myrin, courtesy of the Swedish History Museum. Reproduced here under the terms of its Creative Commons 2.5 license. No changes were made to the image.

Are these scratches an intentional representation of a boat? It’s possible, and this skate would be quite interesting if they are. In that case, this skate becomes a tangible piece of evidence for the link between bone skates and boats in Norse mythology.

In Saxo Grammaticus’s History of the Danes and Olaus Magnus’s
Description of the Northern Peoples, the Norse god Ullr (or Ollerus, as Olaus Magnus calls him) has a magic bone inscribed with runes that he uses to cross the sea as fast as he could in a boat. The magic bone sounds like a bone skate, as long as the sea is frozen. Olaus Magnus’s illustrator seems to have been a little confused on this point, because his depiction makes it look more like a surfboard.

Ullr on his magic bone. From Olaus Magnus (1555:122).

References

Olaus Magnus. 1555. Historia de gentibus septentrionalibus. Rome: n.p.

H. W. Jacobi on bone skates

I recently got hold of a copy of De Nederlandse glissen by H. W. Jacobi, thanks to some kind people in the Netherlands. It’s a paper written for a course at the University of Amsterdam in 1976. This paper has gone viral (in the bone skates sense) despite its obscurity. It has been cited far more times than you’d expect for a student project (which is not at all).

Jacobi catalogs the bone skates in the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden and the Groninger Museum, plus five from other places. The 160 artifacts that make it through the identification process (based on their shapes and wear patterns) are then classified into ten groups, which Wiebe Blau has summarized. An eleventh group, containing 20 artifacts, is for sled runners. Unfortunately, none of these skates are dated, or at least, Jacobi doesn’t provide dates for them. General periods in which bone skates were used in the Netherlands (from the 7th to 14th century at different places) are given, but that’s all.

Jacobi completes the project by making three pairs of bone skates and experimenting with them. The experiments are pretty similar to ones conducted by other archaeologists, most notably Arthur MacGregor at about the same time and Hans Christian Küchelmann and Petar Zidarov more recently. The most interesting difference is that Jacobi didn’t use a pole to push for fear of messing up the ice. Instead, Jacobi’s brother was responsible for propulsion: he (wearing his  modern skates) pushed Jacobi around the ice. Surprisingly, Jacobi was able to steer on bone skates. Nobody else has been able to do this, with disastrous results: In 1915, Antti Juvel, a 75-year-old Finn, reported that

if there was open water ahead, you had no choice but going into it, for it would be too dangerous to fall on the ice in such a great speed and turning was impossible.

Antti Juvel, translated by Auli Touronen and quoted in Küchelmann & Zidarov (2005:437)

Overall, Jacobi’s work is quite short (only 20 pages plus figures) but excellent for a student project. It remains the only detailed summary of the bone skates in these museum collections. However, better general sources on bone skates are available now and have been since Jacobi’s paper was finished—Arthur MacGregor’s two articles came out at about the same time, and he remains one of the heroes of bone skates.

References

Arthur MacGregor. 1976. “Bone Skates: A Review of the Evidence.” Archaeological Journal 133: 57–74.

Arthur MacGregor. 1975. “Problems in the Interpretation of Microscopic Wear Patterns: The Evidence from Bone Skates.” Journal of Archaeological Science 2: 385–390.

Hans Christian Küchelmann and Petar Zidarov. 2005. “Let’s skate together! Skating on bones in the past and today.” In From Hooves to Horns, from Mollusc to Mammoth: Manufacture and Use of Bone Artefacts from Prehistoric Times to the Present, Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the ICAZ Worked Bone Research Group at Tallinn, 26th–31st of August 2003, ed. H. Luik, A. M. Choyke, C. Batey, and L. Löugas, pp. 425–445. Tallinn: Ajaloo Instituut.


Kalderhohdi Farm

In August, 1878, A. Heneage Cocks visited Iceland and got a pair of bone skates. Here’s the story as he told it to J. Romilly Allen:

I noticed the bone skates hanging up in Kalderhohdi Farm on the Log River SW Iceland when putting up there in August 1878. I remember carefully concealing my feeling of excitement when I saw what they were and the mutual satisfaction of the boy to whom they belonged and myself when they changed owners for the consideration of 20 ore (3d). (Allen 1896, 33–35)

I’ve already told you about bone skates. Today’s burning question is, “Where is Kalderhohdi Farm?”

I couldn’t find it. I think Cocks and Balfour, or perhaps the editor of the Reliquary and Illustrated Archaeologist, got it wrong. “Kalderhohdi” is pretty similar to “Kaldárhöfði”—similar enough that it might be what someone who doesn’t speak Icelandic heard. Plus, Kaldárhöfði Farm actually existed at the end of the nineteenth century! It’s even in the right area—southwestern Iceland—and close to a river, though the river is called Ölfusá; I haven’t figured the Log River out yet.

Frederick W. W. Howell visited Kaldárhöfði Farm in about 1900 and took a picture:

kaldarhofdi
Kaldárhöfði Farm in about 1900. Photograph by Frederick W. W. Howell, courtesy of the Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.

The original image, with full bibliographic information, is at the Cornell University Library. That little creek in the front yard looks like a fine place to skate!

Reference

J. Romilly Allen. 1896. “The Primitive Bone Skate.” The Reliquary and Illustrated Archaeologist 2:33–36.

On the Outside Edge

cover-revised-smallMy edition of On the Outside Edge: Being Diversions in the History of Skating is now available on Amazon at such a low price ($8.31) that Amazon will lose money on each copy sold.

The author, George Herbert Fowler, is quite an interesting person. He worked as a scientist at first, but later switched to archive management and made great contributions to both fields. He was also an avid adult skater who contributed to skating by writing a great book on its history. On the Outside Edge chronicles the history of skating until 1897. For years, it had only been available in a handful of rare books rooms in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Fowler describes his own experiments with bone skates (he didn’t know about pushing with a pole, so he tried to push with his feet, with some success) and mistakes in translations of Old Norse literature that led people to believe characters were skating when they weren’t (sometimes they were skiing). The latter part of the book describes the development of skating (primarily figure skating) in various countries. At the end, there is a table of skating moves, dates, and references to where they were first published. All this is done in a quirky style that is a joy to read. I think it’s been under-appreciated for at least a century.

In this edition, I’ve added a lot of commentary to bring Fowler’s work up to date. I also found many of the pictures he mentions and reproduced them in this book. This is the first new edition of the book since 1897.

World Figure Sport exams

Last weekend I was at the World Figure Championship in Vail, Colorado. Exams were being offered, and I decided to study the system experimentally by taking a few. This post is an account of my experience. Since this blog is about studying the history of skating and not my own skating, this post focuses on the examination process, not on how I did. Official details of the exams are available in the exam catalog.

Observations

It was trivial to sign up; I simply told Karen* I was interested in testing the four eights: forward outside, forward inside, backward outside, and backward inside. She said that was certainly doable, but there would be a wait while officials arrived. It turned out that four were necessary:

A facilitator, who assembled all the people involved and selected ice for the warm-up and exam.

An oversight examiner, who made sure I was there and who I claimed. I didn’t realize this person was involved until the end.

A referee, who watched the test and noted any penalties.

A main examiner (judge), who graded the figures.

I warmed up in my assigned spot and, when everyone was ready, moved to the test patch. When the referee said to start, I skated my four eights one by one, moving up the patch each time. I completed six tracings of each without marking my center. I used the same long axis for all four figures. My referee noted no penalties. Then I was asked to disappear into the crowd while the judge had a look.

After the judge had scored my figures, I was shown a sheet with the names of the officials and my scores.** Each figure is scored on a scale of 1–6, with 1 and 2 designated “Encouraging”, 3 and 4 “Competitive”, and 5 and 6 “World Class.” The criteria are the traditional ones described in USFSA publications such as the Rulebook and Evaluation of Errors in Figures. There is no way to fail a test, only encouragement to keep working on a figure. Only one 6 has been received to date, on a forward outside eight at last weekend’s Festival. I was instructed to take a picture of the sheet and enter the data into the database via a form on the World Figure Sport website.

Once all that was done, I received a stack of medals and a certificate. Medals are awarded on a per-figure basis: Gold for World Class figures, silver for Competitive figures, and bronze for Encouraging figures.

Evaluation

Setting up and taking the exams was quite simple and much more low-key than skating tests usually are. The assessment process is summative rather than formative¸ i.e., there is no way for the evaluators to provide the skater with feedback or even explain their marks, unless the skater specifically asks at the end of the exam. This weakness of the system could be ameliorated by adding a space for comments or a checklist of desirable qualities and/or common errors on the examination form.

The other area of possible concern is that there are no levels in the sense of groups of figures that must be tested before others (there are “Figure Foundations” A and B, which are good starting places, and the other figures are grouped by type). Skaters are free to test figures in any order and to re-test figures until they achieve the level they desire. The strength of this approach is that it encourages skaters to keep working on their figures by emphasizing the learning process. Since different people find different figures easier or harder, they can work on figures in the order that makes sense to them rather than following a prescribed order and getting stuck. The weaknesses are that the tests lack a pedagogical structure (this must be provided by the skater or coach) and that there is less of a sense of accomplishment at having finished a level and being officially ready to move on to the next. Skaters must decide for themselves, in consultation with their coaches, what score counts as sufficient. Is a 2 good enough? A 4? Or do you keep working on a figure until you reach the elusive 6? It is possible to re-test figures at any time, which encourages skaters to keep improving all their figures, even the most basic.

Areas for Future Research

Since the role of penalties is unclear and I did well on all four figures I tested, the logical next step is to test some figures I can’t do well.

I am also interested in how the scores match up with the traditional USFSA figure tests. I expect that lower scores correspond to the level of skill expected on lower-level tests, while the Eighth Test may require something closer to World Class ability. These tests are also scored on a 6-point scale, with the number of points needed to pass (the “passing average”) increasing from 2.7 on First Test to 4.5 on Eighth Test.

Notes

*Karen Courtland Kelly, president of the World Figure Sport Society.

**I received 5s on the forward outside and inside eights and 4s on the backward outside and inside eights.

The other Jones

Readers of this blog and everybody else who’s interested in skating history already know about Robert Jones’s Treatise on Skating. But there’s another book, a much more recent one, by a Jones. Ernest Jones is well-known in psychoanalytic circles as a disciple of Freud, and his background on psychology provides the foundation for his book, or rather books, because The Elements of Figure Skating went through two very different editions.

The first edition, published in 1931, comes in at only 135 pages. It begins with the claim that it “is addressed by a beginner to beginners, and the distinctive feature of it is its psychological mode of approach to their problems in studying Figure Skating.” It’s meant to cover the first year of skating, for someone who “has an average degree of suppleness and confidence” and skates about an hour a day (5). In concrete terms, this includes the forward eights, the forward outside three turn, the forward serpentines, and the back outside eight—basically first test. Some attention is also given to ice dancing.

The second edition, published in 1950, is, at 310 pages, a significant expansion of the first. By this point, Jones had had nearly 20 more years to refine his skating skills, and the book makes it clear that he has made good use of them. It includes all kinds of exercises for figures and combinations of them, which makes it a must for anyone doing figures today. What it lacks is details of brackets, rockers, and counters; Jones notes this in his preface and refers to the reader to T. D. Richardson’s Modern Figure Skating.

In the second edition, Jones includes descriptions of various grapevines, which have mostly been forgotten today. These long, intricate two-footed figures are fun to play with but hard to learn from books. Jones notes that “To describe them in detail has been held to be impossible, a challenge which I found hard to resist” (8). People stopped doing them because they were focused on winning competitions, which meant avoiding two-footed skating as much as possible. Jones calls this “a pity” because skating on two feet can look good and helps develop smooth turns and flexibility (218). He also adds a chapter on teaching skating and another on the history of skating. The former shows how his background in psychology informs his coaching, and the latter is interesting if not entirely accurate.

The writing style is clear and entertaining, as demonstrated by the description of the Demon Eight, reproduced here:

I will finish this section by mentioning a particularly ferocious figure known as the Demon Eight. It is so called because of its having been invented by the Devil, a fact which will be obvious to you as soon as you try it. There is only one gentleman—let me call him Mr. A. B., not Mr. B. A.—who can skate it with easy proficiency, so it is not surprising that he has been suspected of complicity in sorcery, if not of something worse. Carry out a full circle on an ordinary No. 1–No. 2 Backward Outside, but before finishing the circle draw the free foot again forward, slip it across the skating foot and in front of it, i.e. inside the circle, and on reaching your centre strike off on a Backward Outside edge on this second foot. What had been the skating leg remains somehow attached to your person, and gradually finds its way to the front. The shoulders have to be strongly reversed in preparation for the change. With luck—and skill—you are now again in a No. 1 Position and you have to hold it until you change to a No. 2 and complete the circle. The change was an inter-circular one, for there are two circles: so it cannot be a Mohawk. But both circles are skated on the same edge; so it cannot be a Choctaw. In fact it is pure wickedness, not to say devilry. (216–217)

Go try it.

References

Ernest Jones. 1931. The Elements of Figure Skating. London: Methuen.

Ernest Jones. 1950. The Elements of Figure Skating. London: Allen & Unwin.

T. D. Richardson. 1930. Modern Figure Skating. London: Methuen.

Further reading

Todd Dufresne and Gary Genosko. 1995. “Jones on Ice: Psychoanalysis and Figure Skating.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 76.1:123–133.

Medieval toe picks

The writers of skating history have awarded Jackson Haines credit for inventing the toe pick in the nineteenth century. They must not have known about the prikschaats (prick-skate). This type of skate features an iron blade with a spike at the toe. It’s not quite like a modern toe pick, being a single spike rather than a set of small teeth, but it’s definitely along those lines.

The prikschaats dates to around 1300–1500. Two have been found so far, one in the Hague and one in Rotterdam. It’s also featured in the manuscript image I described in a previous post, and, if you look carefully, one of Lydwina’s companions might be wearing one in the picture of her accident.

Modern toe picks are for jumping. It’s considered bad form to use them to stop in figure skating (which only works if you’re going backwards anyway), and only beginners use them to push (“toe-pushing” is trained out of beginning skaters early on). I’m not convinced that people were jumping in the Middle Ages. I think it probably represents the shift from pole-pushing to foot-pushing. When they used bone skates, skaters had to push themselves along with a pole. The earliest metal-bladed skates don’t have toe picks, and Niko Mulder has argued that they were propelled with a pole, just like bone skates.

The picture in Douce 5, the manuscript from my earlier post, shows someone skating without a pole, but with prikschaatsen. Maybe early skaters decided to move the point from the pole to the skate so that they could push with their toes. Eventually, they learned that pushing from the side of the blade works even better.

Reference

Niko Mulder. 2008. Ten IJse (2)—Schaatsles voor graaf Floris. Kouwe Drukte 12.34:18–23.

The first picture of metal-bladed skates

It’s not the famous woodcut of Lydwina’s accident from 1498. Check out this image from Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Douce 5. (I can’t post the image here because of copyright restrictions.)

This picture is from a Flemish manuscript that’s around 170 years older than the famous woodcut. It’s a calendar, and the February page shows two kids at the bottom. The one on the left is sliding on a mandibular sled, and the one on the right is ice skating—on metal-bladed skates! You can tell because he or she is not using a pole. Look carefully at the toes of the skates, and you might even see toe picks.

This picture hasn’t made its way into histories of skating yet (except my edition of Fowler, which mentions it in the commentary), but it has been known to archaeologists studying skating for years. It’s included in Randall (1966). MacGregor (1985:146) mentions the sled on the left, but not the skater, perhaps because he was only interested in bones. Küchelmann and Zidarov (2005) bring it into contemporary skating history in their paper on bone skates.

References

G. Herbert Fowler. 1892. On the Outside Edge: Being Diversions in the History of Skating. London: Horace Cox.

Hans Christian Küchelmann and Petar Zidarov. 2005. “Let’s skate together! Skating on bones in the past and today.” In From Hooves to Horns, from Mollusc to Mammoth: Manufacture and Use of Bone Artefacts from Prehistoric Times to the Present, Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the ICAZ Worked Bone Research Group at Tallinn, 26th–31st of August 2003, ed. H. Luik, A. M. Choyke, C. Batey, and L. Löugas, pp. 425–445. Tallinn: Ajaloo Instituut.

Arthur MacGregor. 1985. Bone, Antler, Ivory and Horn: The Technology of Skeletal Materials Since the Roman Period. London: Croom Helm.

Lillian M. C. Randall. 1966. Images in the Margins of Gothic Manuscripts. Berkeley: University of California Press.